🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."